Blog

Nokia 4.2 Overview: One Huge Flaw

Nokia 4.2 Review: One Big Flaw

“The Nokia 4.2 has a number of deserves, nevertheless it’s marred by the processor.”

  • Good battery life
  • Good design and construct high quality
  • Notification mild, NFC, devoted Google Assistant button are useful
  • Android One means 2 years of quick updates
  • Inexpensive
  • Sluggish efficiency
  • Sluggish digicam, mediocre low-light pictures
  • Doesn’t work on Dash, Verizon
  • Micro USB port

Need the very best deal on an inexpensive smartphone this vacation season? Try our favourite Black Friday smartphone offers.

The Nokia 4.2 has been a curler coaster. My preliminary evaluation unit suffered from fixed stutters and freezes that made utilizing the cellphone a hair-pulling affair. The second unit has delivered a markedly improved expertise, nevertheless it doesn’t cease this $189 cellphone from having a number of compromises.

Inexpensive telephones must make sacrifices, however the issue rests with the competitors. Motorola makes a cellphone with efficiency that’s magnitudes higher for simply $10 extra: The Moto G7 Play. It additionally has the extra handy USB-C port, on prime of an honest digicam, nice battery life, and a near-stock Android expertise.

HMD’s Nokia 4.2 has quite a bit going for it. The digicam, whereas sluggish, is succesful in broad daylight. It doesn’t look its worth (in a great way), battery life is superb, and I like the notification LED that circles the facility button. It’s additionally an Android One cellphone, so it’s assured updates for 2 years. However it all boils all the way down to efficiency, and it may be irritating.

Compact design, common show

The Nokia 4.2 doesn’t resemble a funds cellphone. The Moto G7 Play, by comparability, appears and feels decidedly low cost. The Nokia 4.2 has a metallic unibody with a polycarbonate body, and the rear is protected by glass. Meaning it has a better probability of needing a restore after a drop, but in addition makes the cellphone really feel extra substantial.

A fast be aware on the colour. I like to recommend going for the Pink Sand choice over black. It’s far more engaging, and helps the cellphone stand out.

The rear glass is a fingerprint magnet you’ll be wiping down frequently. Talking of fingerprints, there’s a fingerprint sensor current right here. It may be a bit sluggish, which is a constant theme with the Nokia 4.2.

You’re handled to a headphone jack on the prime, a Micro USB charging port on the backside, a devoted Google Assistant button on the left, and a quantity rocker and energy button on the appropriate. The shortage of a USB-C charging port is disappointing; many different merchandise have USB-C ports, from MacBooks and iPad Professionals to Home windows laptops and most Android smartphones. It’s splendid to hold only one cable that may cost something. The $200 Moto G7 Play has one, so why couldn’t HMD add it in right here?

The Nokia 4.2’s processor cripples the cellphone.

The headphone jack is a welcome inclusion, and also you’ll wish to use it or use Bluetooth earbuds, as a result of the bottom-firing audio system aren’t loud. The audio high quality is respectable, although. The buttons across the cellphone are clicky, and the devoted Google Assistant button is helpful for those who use Assistant quite a bit (you possibly can disable it, however can’t remap the button).

My favourite characteristic is the facility button, which glows while you obtain notifications. That’s good, as a result of the Nokia 4.2 doesn’t have an All the time-on Show when it’s not charging (because of the lack of an OLED display). It appears nice, in the dead of night. It might’ve been neat to customise the colour, however you’re caught with white.

I like how compact the Nokia 4.2 feels. The display is simply 5.71 inches, which can sound giant, however as a result of the bezels are slim it packs a number of display in a small-ish package deal. The rounded edges make the cellphone extra comfy to carry, and the glass is clean to the contact.

Nokia 4.2 vs the Pixel 3aThe Nokia 4.2 (prime) vs Pixel 3a. Julian Chokkattu/Digital Traits

The HD+ LCD display is nothing to put in writing house about. It’s colourful and sharp (1,520 x 720 decision) for those who take a look at it from an affordable viewing distance. Look nearer, and pixels are seen. It’s a bit dim, making it arduous to learn the display in broad daylight, and black ranges aren’t as satisfying as an OLED display.

There’s a teardrop notch on the prime, which is the place the selfie digicam sits. The cellphone nonetheless has a “chin,” or backside bezel, however the entrance design helps the Nokia 4.2 look extra fashionable (and simply higher than the Moto G7 Play).

Manageable efficiency

The Nokia 4.2’s processor is what holds all of it again. It’s a Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 chipset with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of inside storage. Whereas 32GB is common for a cellphone this inexpensive, you’ll wish to use the MicroSD card slot, as with my 101 apps put in (together with the preloaded apps), I hit 86 p.c of the allotted storage.

Nokia 4.2 ReviewJulian Chokkattu/Digital Traits

My preliminary evaluation unit pissed off me to no finish because of the fixed cling ups and freezes as I used the cellphone. This turned out to be an issue with the unit; the second mannequin didn’t have many of those points.

Efficiency is respectable. Anticipate stutters right here and there when scrolling by means of apps like Twitter and Instagram, nevertheless it’s bearable. Video games like Pako: Endlessly and Breakneck ran admirably, with just a few dropped frames right here and there. I discovered myself capable of do a lot of the duties I’d accomplish with a flagship smartphone, all of it simply took a bit longer.

Opening an app takes a a number of seconds; so does loading a recreation, or sharing an image, or turning the cellphone on. There have been moments once I shortly wanted to seek for one thing on Google Maps, and I’d be pissed off at how sluggish the cellphone took to provide me what I needed. It’s not the case on a regular basis, however often once I’m juggling between a number of apps.

Listed here are the benchmark outcomes:

  • AnTuTu 3DBench: 77,060
  • Geekbench Four CPU: 896 single-core; 3,313 multi-core
  • 3DMark Sling Shot Excessive: 493 (Vulkan)

These scores are under the Moto G7 Play, which has the superior Snapdragon 632 (so does the Moto G7 Energy). My colleague didn’t have efficiency issues with the Moto G7 collection when he examined it — every part operated easily. Sadly, the Nokia 4.2 will inevitably frustrate you in some unspecified time in the future.

Android One

I like HMD’s telephones as a result of most run the Android One program. They’re assured no less than two years of Android software program and safety updates. These updates roll out shortly, too, so that you hardly want to attend after Google rolls them out. Compared, Samsung Galaxy S9 house owners needed to wait six months for the corporate to convey Android Pie to the cellphone.

The advantage of updates means the cellphone stays safe, you acquire new options, and bugs and points have a better probability of being patched. That is the place HMD has Motorola beat. Motorola hardly provides a yr of Android updates for its telephones — the Moto G7 Play will solely get Android Q, and never far more.

Nokia 4.2 ReviewJulian Chokkattu/Digital Traits

Android One doesn’t simply imply quick updates, although. You obtain inventory Android, which is uncluttered, easy, and straightforward to make use of. There’s no bloatware, apart from preloaded Google apps. There’s even NFC on board, so you should use Google Pay (one other plus over the Moto G7 Play).

Whereas the software program is a constructive expertise on the Nokia 4.2, I did encounter a bug. If the cellphone’s left alone and on standby, it could generally disconnect from Wi-Fi. Turning the display again on reconnects it, nevertheless it’s a difficulty I haven’t been capable of resolve. We’ve additionally seen this bug on the Moto G7 collection, so there’s an opportunity it’s Android-related and never system particular.

Sluggish digicam

The Nokia 4.2 has a dual-camera system on the rear — one 13-megapixel lens paired with a 2-megapixel depth-sensing digicam. The digicam might be sluggish to launch, and the shutter can even take its time. Due to this, you could be nonetheless when attempting to take a photograph to keep away from a blurry outcome.

Nokia 4.2 ReviewJulian Chokkattu/Digital Traits

However in good lighting, the Nokia 4.2 might be succesful. It does an honest job of coping with high-contrast situations with HDR, particulars are strong, and colours look pure. Working example? The image of the Vessel in New York Metropolis, in addition to the photograph of my canine mendacity on my mattress. They’re spectacular for a $189 cellphone.

As regular, it’s in low-light environments that the digicam begins to degrade in high quality. Pictures are grainy. Whereas I needed to keep nonetheless earlier than, in low-light you could be as nonetheless as a statue.. I noticed higher outcomes utilizing the Professional mode within the digicam at night time, however not everybody will perceive use handbook controls.

Portrait Mode works effectively in good lighting circumstances, however any dip in mild, together with use indoors, could make pictures look poor. It has hassle focusing in these conditions, and pictures by no means look fairly sharp. HDR by no means appears to work as effectively in Portrait Mode, too.

Pattern photographs from the Nokia 4.2

The 8-megapixel digicam on the entrance works decently, although it has an issue with high-contrast situations. Within the selfie picture of me, the sky is totally blown out. The Portrait Mode selfie photograph is healthier, because the publicity is correct with no blown-out areas, and there’s a pleasant bokeh impact.

It’s a succesful digicam that takes a destructive flip in low mild, like all funds telephones. You do must work with the digicam to remain extraordinarily nonetheless, although, which is annoying. It’s corresponding to the Moto G7 Play, although I believe the Nokia 4.2 fares a bit higher in high quality.

Good battery life

Lastly, we get to the very best a part of the Nokia 4.2. By no means in my time reviewing the cellphone did I fear about it dying on me. The three,000mAh battery isn’t giant, however with low energy specs and a low-resolution display, it’s sufficient to maintain the cellphone whirring for greater than a day.

With arduous use, the cellphone will hit round 20 or 30 p.c by midnight. With mild to common use, it is going to nonetheless have juice for a second day, although it would require a recharge by midday.

Whereas I used to be proud of the battery in real-world testing, the Nokia 4.2 didn’t fare as effectively in our battery take a look at. I performed a 1080p YouTube video with the display brightness at max on Wi-Fi, and the Nokia 4.2 solely survived for 7 hours and 38 minutes. It’s an honest time, however the Moto G7 Play lasted greater than 9 hours, and the $250 Moto G7 Energy stayed alive for almost 14 hours.

Battery take a look at apart, most individuals might be greater than glad with what the Nokia 4.2 can supply right here. It’s only a disgrace it wants a Micro USB cable to cost.

Value, availability, and guarantee info

The Nokia 4.2 is $189 and accessible from Amazon and Finest Purchase. It solely works on GSM networks, so you should use it on carriers like AT&T, T-Cellular, Cricket Wi-fi, and Metro by T-Cellular. It gained’t work on CDMA networks like Verizon or Dash.

HMD provides a normal one-year guarantee that covers the cellphone from manufacturing defects one yr because the buy date.

Our Take

The Nokia 4.2’s beauty, nice battery life, respectable digicam, and speedy Android updates are held again by a weak processor. It’s succesful, however there are higher options.

Is there a greater various?

Sure, the Moto G7 Play. It shares lots of the identical specs because the Nokia 4.2, from the three,000mAh battery to 3GB of RAM, however the processor is what pulls it forward. The Snapdragon 632 is far more succesful and gained’t frustrate you. That’s why I believe the G7 Play is the higher purchase for simply $11 extra at $200.

It does come down as to if you wish to select longer software program assist over efficiency, as these Motorola telephones will solely ship one Android model replace (Android Q), whereas the Nokia 4.2 will get Android R subsequent yr as effectively. Whereas we usually give reward to telephones that promise software program updates for 2 or extra years, I believe the numerous enhance in processor energy offers the Moto G7 Play the sting.

In the event you spend $250, you should purchase the Moto G7 Energy, which has an even bigger display — however you get the identical efficiency because the Moto G7 Play. Higher but, the 5,000mAh battery means it’s a two-day cellphone.

If you wish to follow the Nokia model, it’s price shelling out $300 for the Nokia 7.1. It has good efficiency, the identical Android One software program, and a succesful digicam. In case your funds goes up a bit extra, then the Google Pixel 3a must be in your checklist, as a result of it’s all of the cellphone you want at simply $400.

For extra, take a look at our information to the very best low cost telephones.

How lengthy will it final?

The Nokia 4.2 is sandwiched in glass, so it’s best to get a case to verify it doesn’t crack from a drop. It’s additionally not water-resistant.

On the plus aspect, the cellphone will obtain two years of Android model and safety updates, so it ought to final two years on the minimal. That’s if the efficiency doesn’t take a flip for the more severe by then.

Must you purchase it?

No. A 600-series Qualcomm processor contained in the Nokia 4.2 would have modified the story, however the Snapdragon 439 doesn’t lower it when you should purchase a cellphone with higher efficiency for simply $11 extra.

Editors’ Suggestions




Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *